Vikash @ Biru Sah @ Vikash Kumar @Viru v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.41870 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2016 Thana -DAWATH District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. VIKASH @ BIRU SAH @ VIKASH KUMAR @VIRU Son of Uday Sah, R/o Vill.- Semari , P.S.- Dawath , District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri S. Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-09-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dawath P.S.Case no.84 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and later on his name transpired on the basis of confession of the co-accused and it further appears that he is accused in five other case also. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that once he was arrested, he has been made accused in five other cases also and further nothing has been recovered from his possession in this case as well as he has not been put on TIP. The petitioner is in custody for about seven months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41870 of 2017 (2) dt.11-09-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Dawath P.S.Case No.84 of 2016. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. In the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. (iv) Further condition that till conclusion of the trial of this case, he will make his attendance before the concerned Police Station of the area in the first week of every month, otherwise, his bail bond shall be cancelled.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T