Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66690/2024bail granted

Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-05Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66690 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-240 Year-2024 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar S/o Mahendra Mahton R/o vill - Lohra, P.S. - Jamui, Dist. - Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIhar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 240 of 2024 dated 26.04.2024 registered for the offence/s punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, eight unknown miscreants are alleged to have snatched motorcycle, mobile phone and Rs. 4,000/- from the informant and Kuso Singh, after assaulting them with lathi and danda.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66690 of 2024(2) dt.05-10-2024 2/2 the petitioner has sprung up in the confession statement of the co-accused Niraj Kumar who has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 01.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc No. 63405 of 2024. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Jamui in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 240 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T