Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Charli v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65081 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-302 Year-2022 Thana- RAFIGANJ District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Charli S/O Binod Kumar R/O VillageCharkawa, PS- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-02-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rafiganj PS Case No. 302 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 413, 414, 420, 468 and 34 of IPC.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had earlier moved before this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc No. 13761 of 2025 and the same was allowed by an order dated 12-5-2025 with a condition that if charge-sheet is submitted connecting the petitioner with the offence, in that event, the anticipatory bail order shall lose its effect. Learned counsel next submits that after investigation, the police submitted charge-sheet, based on which cognizance

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65081 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 came to be taken, but no fresh material transpired during the course of investigation connecting the petitioner with the offence.

4.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner with a condition that if chargesheet is submitted connecting the petitioner with the offence, in that event, the anticipatory bail order shall lose its effect. It is next submitted that since charge-sheet has been submitted, the petitioner should surrender and seek regular bail as the case relates to theft of motorcycle and name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of apprehended accused.

5.

Considering the submission made by learned APP, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T