Kiran Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8392 of 2016 =========================================================== Kiran Kumari, W/o Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Rai, R/o Village- Rani-3, Ward No. 9, P.S.- Bachhwara, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Director, I.C.D.S, Deptt. of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Begusarai.

5. District Program Officer-cum- Coordinator-cum-District-Superintendent of Education, Begusarai.

6. Child Development Project Officer, Bachwara, Begusarai.

7. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Rani-3, Block- Bachwara, P.S.- Bachwara, District- Begusarai.

8. Smt. Bhawani Kumari, W/o Smt. Parsuram Rai, Aanganwari Sevika, Anganwari Kendra, Code No.-161, Ward No. 9, Gram Panchayat Rani-III, Block- Bachwara, District- Begusarai.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, AC to GP-1 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-01-2017 Heard parties.

In view of limited prayer made at the time of hearing, this writ application is being disposed of, without going into the merit of the case, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned appellate forum for redressal of her grievance which would be available to her in law.

If such appeal/representation is filed before the competent

Patna High Court CWJC No.8392 of 2016 dt.25-01-2017 2/2 forum, let the same be disposed of on its own merit and in accordance with law expeditiously but not later than three months from the date of filing of such appeal/representation.

However, it is made clear that before taking a final decision, such competent forum should grant reasonable opportunity to all the concerned including the private respondent. It is further made clear that a copy of order of selection/appointment of respondent no.8 should also be given to the petitioner on demand after payment of requisites, if required. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K. Pandey/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 27.01.2017 Transmission Date N.A.