Nanhu Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2471 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Nanhu Yadav and Ors Son of Late Budhan Yadav, resident of Village- Girgi, P.O.- Rajauri, P.S.- Rajauri, at District- Nawada. 2.

Arjun Ram, S/o Sri Ram Bilas Ram, resident of Village- Dumarkoal, P.O.- Rajauri, P.S. Rajauri, at District- Nawada.

3.

Hari Yadav, S/o Jato Yadav, Resident of Village- Kumarwa, P.O.- Rajauri, P.S.- Rajauri, District- Nawada.

4.

Dilip Yadav, son of Puna Yadav, Resident of Village Kumarwa, P.O. Rajauri, P.S.- Rajauri, District- Nawada.

5.

Surendra Rajbanshi, S/o Late Latan Rajbanshi, resident of Village- Hardiya, P.O. Hardiya, P.S.- Rajauri, District- Nawada. 6.

Nunshi Yadav, Son of Sri Basdev Yadav, resdetn of Village- Kumarwa, P.O.- Rajauri, P.S.- Rajauri, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Nawada, District- Nawada. 3.

The Secretary Cum Commissioner, Forest and Environmental Department, Govt. of Bihar at Patna.

4.

The Principal Director Chief Conservator of the Forest Department of the Forest and Environment, Go 5.

The Forest Conservator, Nawada, at District- Nawada. 6.

The Divisional Forest Officer, Nawada, Division, at District- Nawada. 7.

The Range Officer, Rajauri Range, Nawada, Division, Forest Department at District- Nawada.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raghwanand- GA-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 18-09-2023 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been filed for the issuance of direction, order/orders writ/writs in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents-authority to consider the case of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.2471 of 2018(2) dt.18-09-2023 2/2 petitioners for their regularization of service in Group 'B' employee much before the year 1980 and challenging the letter no. 2798 dated 23.9.2017 passed by the respondent no.6 (D.F.O..Nawada) and fulfill all the requirements as required earlier.

3. Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submit that they may be granted liberty to approach the concerned respondent no. 6.

4. The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Jagdish/- U