Vijay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67387 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2024 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Vijay Yadav Son of Late Nanhu Yadav Resident of Village- Gango Bigha, PS- Rampur, Distt.- Gaya 2.
Raj Kumari Devi Wife of Vijay Yadav Resident of Village- Ganga Bigha, PS- Rampur, Distt.- Gaya 3.
Anup Yadav @ Anup Kumar Yadav Son of Vijay Yadav Resident of VillageGanga Bigha, PS- Rampur, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Ajay Kumar Son of Vijay Singh Resident of Village- Pandit Bigha, P.O.- Barheta, PS- Paras Bigha, Distt.- Jehanabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nand Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-12-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Rampur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2024, dated 12.01.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 498(A), 363 and 365/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned A.P.P. for the State at the outset submits that the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted carry punishment of seven years and less.
4. The said submission of the learned A.P.P. is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67387 of 2024(3) dt.18-12-2024 2/2
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the investigation of the case against the petitioners is still continuing but then no notice under Section 41(A) of the Cr.P.C. has been issued to the petitioners on which learned A.P.P. submits that the anticipatory bail application be disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar).
6. In view of the submissions made by the learned A.P.P., the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3536 of 2024.
7. The petitioners would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of three weeks from today with a web copy of the order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3536 of 2024 and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the direction contained in the said order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3536 of 2024.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T