Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41810 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -109 Year- 2017 Thana -KAUAKOL District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Pramod Kumar Son of Ganesh Prasad, R/o Village- Laleyadih, P.S.- Haveli Khargpur, District- Munger.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Kumar For the State : Dr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 11-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Kawakole P.S. Case No. 109 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-287, 324, 308 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the informant was not the employee of the Electricity Department. He was working under Pramod Kumar (petitioner). Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the informant himself went to do work without taking permission from Electrity Department. The petitioner is Junior Lineman and he cannot give the order to connect the electricity of the pole. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41810 of 2017 (2) dt.11-09-2017 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No. 109 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Nawada subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T