Patna High CourtL.P.A/2145/2016dismissed

Ram Gopal Roy v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-10-18The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.2145 of 2016 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 2104 of 2012 ====================================================== Ram Gopal Roy, Son of Late Shiv Shankar Roy, resident of villageChakiya, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Regional Deputy Director, Munger.

3. The Commissioner, Munger.

4. The District Magistrate, Begusarai.

5. The District Superintendent of Education, Begusarai.

6. The Sub-Divisional Education Officer, Barauni.

7. The Block Development Officer, Barauni. null null

8. The Block Education Extension Officer, Barauni. null null

9. The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj Malhipur, South, Begusarai.

10. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Malhipur South, Begusarai.

11. Sri Harasha Charitra, S/o Sri Ramesh Chandra Resident of villageBaghi, P.S. Town Begusarai, District- Begusarai.

12. Sri Nand Kishore Singh, Son of Sri Ram Karan Singh, Resident of village- Hajipur, P.S. Barauni, District- Begusarai. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 18-10-2017 This appeal has been filed against the order dated 23.01.2013, passed in a contempt case, bearing M.J.C. No. 2104 of 2012.

In the contempt case, after going through the showcause filed, learned Court found that the order passed by this

Patna High Court LPA No.2145 of 2016 (3) dt.18-10-2017 2/2 Court has been complied with and refused to take cognizance in the matter and dismissed the contempt application. Against the order passed refusing cognizance in a contempt case, even under the Contempt of Courts Act, no appeal is provided and under Clause 10(a) of Letters Patent, no appeal against a contempt case is permissible.

This appeal is, accordingly dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- U