Raja Devi @ Radha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65296 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2023 Thana- KISHANGAANJ RAIL P.S. DistrictKatihar ====================================================== 1.

Raja Devi @ Radha Devi Wife Of Late Sibhu Mahto R/O Mohalla- Qrt. No. E-138-B, Railway Colony, Ps- Rail Thana Kishanganj, Dist- Kishanganj 2.

Uttam Mahto Son Of Late Sibhu Mahto R/O Mohalla- Qrt. No. E-138-B, Railway Colony, Ps- Rail Thana Kishanganj, Dist- Kishanganj 3.

Shila Devi Wife Of Gottam Mahto R/O Mohalla- Qrt. No. E-138-B, Railway Colony, Ps- Rail Thana Kishanganj, Dist- Kishanganj 4.

Baby Devi @ Bebi Devi Wife Of Uttam Mahto R/O Mohalla- Qrt. No. E138-B, Railway Colony, Ps- Rail Thana Kishanganj, Dist- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Diwakar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioners along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant due to nonfulfillment of further dowry demand.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65296 of 2023(2) dt.12-10-2023 2/2 dirty village politics. They have committed no offence. He submitted that the petitioners are the in-law's of the deceased. He submitted that the petitioners have no concern with mess and business of the deceased as well as her husband and also they live separately from them. He further submitted that the husband of the deceased is languishing in judicial custody. They are languishing in judicial custody since 11.03.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Katihar in connection with Kishangaanj Rail P.S. Case No. 13 of 2023. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T