Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63405 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2022 Thana- NIMCHAKBATHANI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

PAPPU YADAV Son of Sri Umesh Mahto Resident of Village- Sighaul, P.S.- Nimchak Bathani, District- Gaya 2.

NIRANJAN KUMAR Son of Sri Satendra Yadav Resident of VillageSighaul, P.S.- Nimchak Bathani, District- Gaya 3.

SANTU KUMAR Son of Sri Jaikumar Yadav Resident of Village- Sighaul, P.S.- Nimchak Bathani, District- Gaya 4.

AJAY KUMAR Son of Sri Saryu Yadav Resident of Village- Sighaul, P.S.- Nimchak Bathani, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prithivi Raj Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 24-04-2023

1. Heard both the parties.

2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Nimchak Bathani P.S. Case No. 36 of 2022, dated 18.03.2022, instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the I.P.C.

3. Considering the role assigned to the accused petitioners in the F.I.R. causing injuries, which have been noticed by the Trial Court while rejecting bail application, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the above named petitioners.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63405 of 2022(2) dt.24-04-2023 2/2

4. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Pravinkumar/- Item No. 73 U