Barun Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63403 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2022 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhubani ====================================================== Barun Kumar Chaudhary Son Of Rajendra Chaudhary @ Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary @ Rajendra Prasad R/O Vill.- Khaira Tilai Tole, Kabarpatti, P.S.- Rudrapur, Distt.- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Shila Devi Wife Of Barun Kumar Chaudhary R/O Vill.- Khaira Tilay Tole Kuwarpatti, P.S.- Rudrapur, Distt.- Madhubani, At Present Resident Of Vill.- Pilakhbar, P.S.- Rajnagar, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-05-2023 Heard Mr. Ravi Prakash, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 13 of 2022, registered under Sections 323, 341, 498(A), 494 and 354(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The present case relates to matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the complainant, who are husband and wife.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to settle the dispute to that effect he has also made specific statement in para-16 of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63403 of 2022(2) dt.16-05-2023 2/2 bail application.
5. Considering the fact that the parties are having strained matrimonial relationship, in case the parties disagree to live together, the Court below will strive to reconcile the matrimonial dispute between the parties by referring the matter before the District Mediation Centre till then the petitioner is directed to be released on provisional bail till the report of the District Mediation Centre and in case the O.P. No. 2 deliberately refuses to live with the petitioner, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail on such terms and conditions as the learned Court below deems it fit and proper.
6. The bail application, accordingly, stands disposed of.
(Purnendu Singh, J) manish/- U T