Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69592 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2022 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== RANJAN KUMAR SON OF SRI RAMPRAVESH YADAV R/O VILL.- CHAINPURA, P.S.- TEKARI, DISTT.- GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Prithivi Raj Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, when the informant reached Panchanpur, seven persons have surrounded the auto rickshaw and looted his auto with one mobile and cash Rs. 1300/-.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that from
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69592 of 2022(2) dt.28-02-2023 2/2 the perusal of record, it appears that the FIR was lodged against 6-7 unknown accused persons. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. His name has been transpired in this case on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of case and nature of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T