Bihar Bhoodan Yagna Committee, Karyakarta Sangh, Kadam Kuan, Patna v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And O
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2473 of 2017 IN LPA 505 of 2016 =========================================================== Bihar Bhoodan Yagna Committee, Karyakarta Sangh, Kadam Kuan, Patna 3 at Present Gardanibagh, P.s. Gardanibagh, District Patna 2, A Registered, Trade Union bearing Registration no. 2943 through its General Secretary .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
2. Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. Sujata Chaturvedi The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Bihar Bhoodan Yagna Committee through its Chairman Sri Subhmoorty, Office Address Gardanibagh, Road No. 34, Quarter no. 2 P.S. Anisabad P.S. Gardanibagh, District Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shruti Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. KHURSHID ALAM - AAG 12 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 16-04-2018 Considering the fact that in the writ petition, this Court did not issue any mandamus or direction, only found that the State Government, under the statute is not liable to make payment, therefore, only observed that the State Government may take a policy decision with regard to grant in aid to the Committee in question. Keeping in view the same, and the manner in which
Patna High Court MJC No.2473 of 2017 dt.16-04-2018 2/2 the writ petition was disposed of now merely because no grant is sanctioned, we see no reason to initiate a proceeding as no positive direction or mandamus was issued in the writ petition. The observation was only a passing remark to the State Government to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
In view of the same, this application stands dismissed. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) N.H./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date19-04-2018 Transmission Date