Chandan Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42334 of 2017 (4) dt.07-11-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42334 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -112 Year- 2017 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Chandan Kumar son of Sri Jokhan Ram resident of Mohalla : Badaiya Bagh, P.S. : Sasaram (Model), District : Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Deo Narain Paswan, S.I. Economic Crime Unit, Bihar, Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amit Kumar Rakesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sasaram P.S. Case No. 112 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a), 38 and 41 of the Excise Act.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has not been named in the F.I.R, he has been made accused in this case on his self confession made in some other case. Further submission is that though he is accused in two more cases but he is on bail in those case. Petitioner has been in judicial custody since 13.05.2017.
Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of EOU, they could not controvert the above submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42334 of 2017 (4) dt.07-11-2017 the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -II-cum-Special Court, Excise, Rohtas, in connection with Sasaram P.S. Case No. 112 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T