Patna High CourtCWJC/1474/2018withdrawn

Md. Rafique Uddin And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-05Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1474 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Md. Rafique Uddin S/o Late Hamid Uddin, Resident of S.M. Raza Street, Nityanand ka Kuan Lodi Katra, Patna City near Jaggan Goap, Patna.

2. Md. Parvez Quasim, S/o late Md. Quasim, Resident of Bagh Kallo Khan, Patna City, P.O. Jhauganj,P.S. Khajekola, Dist.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department, of Public Health Engineering, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Public Heal Engineering, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Engineering-in-Chief-Cum-Special Secretary, Public Health Engineering, Department, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Chief Engineer (Mechanical) Department of Public Heath Engineering, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Circle Patna.

6. The Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Patna East, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Siyaram Pandey, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. U.P. Singh, AC to SC4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-09-2018 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with a liberty to file representation.

This writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioners to file a representation along with a copy of this order and the authority concerned will consider the same in terms of the order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3331 of 2013 (Ashok Kumar Sharma Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) disposed of on 7.1.2016. The authority

Patna High Court CWJC No.1474 of 2018(3) dt.05-09-2018 2/2 will examine the case of the petitioners as well as the case of Ashok Kumar Sharma (supra) and if the facts of both the cases are similar and identical, it goes without saying that the petitioners will also be extended the same benefits as has been given to Ashok Kumar Sharma and others.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U