Arbind Pandit v. The State Of Bihar Through Its Principal Secretary And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2836 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8428 of 2014 ====================================================== Arbind Pandit, Son of Late Rameshwar Pandit, Resident of village - Ballo Chak, P.O. Bhagwanpur, P.S. Dalsinghsarai, District - Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely, D.S. Gangwar.
2. Mr. D.S. Gangwar, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. Mr. Sanjeevan Kumar Sinha, the Joint Secretary, Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4. Mr. Ram Chandra Tuddu, the Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
5. Mr. Brajesh Kumar Ojha, the District Education Officer, Samastipur.
6. Mr. Narendra Singh, the Block Education Extension Officer, Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur.
7. Smt. Usha Kumari, the Head Master, Upgraded Middle School, Ahmadpur Sarairanjan, District - Samastipur.
8. Mr.
Ram Chandra Mandal, the District Programme Officer (Establishment ), Samastipur.
.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra, SC-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 01-10-2018 While learned counsel for the Opposite Parties submits that a show cause has already been filed showing compliance of the order passed by the learned writ Court, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present application may be disposed off giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order as contained in Annexure 'A' vide Memo No. 753 dated
Patna High Court MJC No.2836 of 2016 (5) dt.01-10-2018 2/2 21.08.2018 in an appropriate jurisdiction.
This application stands disposed off giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order as contained in Annexure 'A' to the show cause in an appropriate jurisdiction. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) R.R.Ojha/Ved/- U