Ali Hasan Ansari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.320 of 2014 =========================================================== Ali Hasan Ansari S/O Late Rajdin Mian R/O Rdaha, P.S. Thakaraha (Bhitaha) District West Champaran .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar through The Director, Panchayati Raj, Bihar, Patna
2. The State Election Commission, Bihar Through Its Secretary, Bihar, Patna
3. The District Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran
4. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran
5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bagaha in The District Of West Champaran
6. The Executive Officer cum Block Development Officer, Bhitaha Block In The District Of West Champaran
7. Asfaque S/O Sk. Mohammad Ali R/O Shekhpati Bhuidharwa, P.S. Thakaraha, District - West Champaran, At Present Pramukh Of Panchayat Samiti Bhitaha In The District Of West Champaran
8. Harakh Raut Son of Late Lakharaj Gaddi Resident Of Semarbari, P.S. - Thakaraha (Bhitaha) District - West Champaran
9. Khajanti Yadav Son of Maharaj Yadav Resident Of Tola, P.S. - Thakaraha (Bhitaha) District - West Champaran
10. Nirmala Devi Wife of Hira Yadav Resident Of Village - Jiganahi, P.S. Thakaraha (Bhitaha), District - West Champaran
11. Gamha Devi Wife of Jhkkad Ram Resident Of Village Khairwar, P.S. - Thakaraha (Bhitaha), District - West Champaran
12. Subhash Bin Son of Paras Bin Resident Of Hathuawa, P.S. Thakaraha (Bhitaha) District - West Champaran
13. Urpramila Devi Wife of Resident Of Bairatawa, District - West Champaran
14. Mandodari Devi Wife of Kedar Sah Resident Of Dihipakadi, P.S. - Thakaraha (Bhitaha) District West Champaran .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. BIMLESH KUMAR PANDEY For the Respondent/s : Mr. MITHILESH KUMAR PATHAK =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-02-2015 Counsel for the parties are present.
Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by passage of time, the writ petition has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.
(Jyoti Saran, J.) Vats/- U