← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44767/2017bail granted

Aditya Ranjan @ Rishu Tiwary @ Pradeep v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-21Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44767 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2017 Thana -KUDRA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== Aditya Ranjan @ Rishu Tiwary @ Pradeep S/o late Kamakhya Narayan Tiwary, R/o Village Urda, P.S. Chenari, District Rohtas (Sasaram). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 2.

21-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner, in the present case, is seeking regular bail in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 69 of 2017, G.R. No. 835/2017, registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that he had hired a car in question, which was being driven by Ajay Kumar Sah, the driver engaged by the informant. He submits that in fact the stolen car has already been recovered from the possession of one Vivek Kumar Raj, who made an allegation that the stolen car was sold to him by this petitioner. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44767 of 2017 (2) dt.21-09-2017 got clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is in custody since 12.06.2017, and the person from whose possession the stolen car has been recovered and other co-accused have been granted regular bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 40882/2017 and Cr. Misc. No. 39333/2017.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and materials on record, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua, in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 69/2017, G.R. No. 835/2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- U T