Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44799/2017rejected

Kashi Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-15Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44799 of 2017 (3) dt.15-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44799 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -81 Year- 2014 Thana -TEKARI District- GAYA ====================================================== Kashi Chaudhary, son of Sri Bithal Chaudhary, resident of VillagePanchanpur, P.S. Tekari, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nand Kishore Pd ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Sessions Trial No. 10 of 2016, arising out of Tekari P.S. Case No. 81 of 2014, registered under Sections 304(B), 120(B) and 328 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Gaya.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected thrice lastly on 22.07.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 7918 of 2017 by this Court. It is further submitted that petitioner is husband of the deceased, daughter of the informant and he is in custody since 27.05.2015 but till today the trial of the petitioner has not been concluded.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44799 of 2017 (3) dt.15-11-2017 A report regarding the present stage of trial has been received through letter no. 181 dated 13.10.2017, from the court of 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya, which shows that out of nine charge sheeted witnesses, five witnesses have already been examined and the trial is expected to be concluded within six months.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, I find no ground to reconsider the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner within six months by taking all effective steps. If the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within aforesaid period of six months, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T