← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46965/2017bail granted

Bundela Rajbhar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-08Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46965 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -83 Year- 2016 Thana -BHORE District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Bundela Rajbhar Son of Late Banka Rajbhar Resident of villageBhagwanpur, P.S.- Bhorey, District- Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Bhakta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bhorey P.S. Case No. 83 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is father in law of the deceased and the case is of dowry death.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has no role to play in the death of the deceased as no specific allegation has been made against the petitioner. Further petitioner has been in judicial custody since 04.12.2016. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46965 of 2017 (3) dt.08-11-2017 2/2 bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-XII, Gopalganj, in connection with Bhorey P.S. Case No. 83 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U