Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68250/2024dismissed

Kishan Kumar @ Kishan Yadav @ Krishan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-30Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68250 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-409 Year-2024 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== Kishan Kumar @ Kishan Yadav @ Krishan Kumar S/o Ranjit Yadav R/o Village- Rautara, P.S.- Rautara, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raju Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Saharsa P.S. Case No. 409 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections-392 & 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, in course of going to take her grandson from school, at the gate of the school, the gold chain of the informant was snatched away by two persons riding on a motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been implicated in this case due to high handedness of police. The petitioner is neither named in the FIR nor he was arrested at the spot and none has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68250 of 2024(2) dt.30-09-2024 2/2 seen the petitioner on the place of occurrence. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 25-04-2024.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. The petitioner was identified in CCTV footage. The looted gold chain of the informant was recovered from possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got criminal antecedent of four cases.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, presently, I am not inclined to enlarge bail to the petitioner and accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

8. However, if so advised, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after six months from today. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T