Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43943/2017bail granted

Jai Prakash Azad Paswan @ Azad v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-09-15Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43943 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1531 Year- 2015 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Jai Prakash Azad Paswan @ Azad Son of Rajeshwar Paswan @ Ram Nagina Ram, R/o Village- Lalganj Tola, Sakhra, P.S.- Dehri, DistrictRohtas, presently reside at Sector No.90, Road Bokaro Steel City, Qurter No.2095, P.S.- Harna, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Asha Devi W/o Jai Prakash Azac Paswan @ Azad, D/o Late Laxmi Paswan, R/o Village- Nokha, Ward No.11, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 07.08.2017. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43943 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 2/2 been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the state, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Complaint case No.1531 of 2015. (Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T