← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15506/2025disposed

Md. Murataj v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-13Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15506 of 2025 ====================================================== Md. Murataj Son of Md. Salimuddin @ Saleem, Resident of Parbheli near Mazar, PS Kadwa, District Katihar, Bihar 855105. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Collector, at Katihar, District Katihar.

3.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, at Barsoi, District Katihar. 4.

The Additional Collector, at Katihar, District Katihar. 5.

The Circle Officer, at Kadwa, District Katihar. 6.

Shekh Jainuddin, Son of Late Abdus Sattar, Resident of Village Parbheli, Pargana Kumaripur, PS Kadwa, Sub-Registry Katihar, District Katihar. 7.

Baharuddin, Son of Late Siddique, Resident of Village Parbheli, PS Kadwa, District Katihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, AC to GP-22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 13-10-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):

for issuance of a writ in the nature of "Mandamus" commanding and directing the state respondent no.3 to dispose off restoration application filed on 05.02.2025 for recalling the order dated 10.07.2024 whereby and whereunder the state respondent no.3 has been pleased to terminate the Mutation Revision No.

Patna High Court CWJC No.15506 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 2/2 284/2017 on account of non-prosecution of the concerned parties and as such the order dated 22.07.2017 passed by the Deputy Collector Lands Reforms, at Katihar, District- Katihar in Mutation Appeal Case no. 57/2015-16 has been affirmed without going into the merits of the case.

3. Learned State Counsel submits that the concerned respondent shall be taking up the restoration application and pass a necessary order.

4. On that premise, the writ petition is disposed of and it is expected that the application preferred by the petitioner on 05.02.2025 shall be taken to its logical conclusion at an earliest. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U