Raju Ranjan Singh @ Ravi Ranjan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45418 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-285 Year-2014 Thana- MARHAURA District- Saran ====================================================== Raju Ranjan Singh @ Ravi Ranjan Singh, S/o Ram Naresh Singh, Resident of Village- Salimpur, P.S.- Madhaura, District- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SRI SATYENDRA PRASAD ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected twice vide order dated 18.03.2016 and 01.03.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 56718 of 2015 and 2156 of 2017 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 22.09.2014 and up-till now the trial has not been concluded though there was direction to conclude the trial within a period of four months, failing which the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer of bail. It has also been submitted that up-till now no progress has been made after order dated 01.03.2017 in the trial.

Learned APP fairly submits that the trial has not been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45418 of 2017(2) dt.20-09-2017 2/2 concluded and the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II, Saran at Chapra in S. Tr. No. 63 of 2015 arising out of Madowrah P. S. Case No. 285 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T