Ranjan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66253 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2022 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

RANJAN YADAV S/O JAGDISH YADAV Resident of village- Harkeshpur, P.S.- Maharajgang, District- Siwan.

2.

MUKESH YADAV S/O JAGDISH YADAV Resident of villageHarkeshpur, P.S.- Maharajgang, District- Siwan. 3.

Chhotu Yadav @ Chhotu Kumar Yadav S/O Rajendra Yadav Resident of village- Harkeshpur, P.S.- Maharajgang, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Deeksha Singh, Advocate Mr. Mukesh Kant, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on orders of Jagdish Yadav, accused Dhanesh and Ravi assaulted his brother with fasli and knife repeatedly causing injury, further on alarm accused persons fled away and his brother died. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66253 of 2022(2) dt.20-12-2022 2/2 next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR it would manifest that specific allegation of assaulting the informant's brother is against Dhanesh and Ravi and the petitioners have been implicated based on general and omnibus allegations.

Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners but are not able to meet the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that specific allegation of assault is against Dhanesh and Ravi.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Maharajgang P.S. Case No. 161 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T