Umesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59821 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2018 Thana- KARANDAY District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== 1.

UMESH YADAV Son of Saryug Yadav 2.

Vikash Yadav Son of Radhey Yadav 3.

Guddu Yadav Son of Preman Yadav 4.

Ajeet Yadav Son of Baleshwar Yadav 5.

Balak Yadav Son of Bhuneshwar Yadav All are Resident of Village - Angpur, P.S.- Chewara, District- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 342, 323, 324, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the FIR named accused including these petitioners is to have assaulted the son and nephew of the informant by means of iron rod and lathi with intent to kill them as a result of which, they sustained head injury and became seriously injured. The injured were brought to Sadar Hospital, Sheikhpura fromwhere, they were referred to PMCH, Patna, however, during treatment, son of informant, Golden Kumar

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59821 of 2019(3) dt.04-12-2019 2/2 succumbed to injuries.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, statement of witnesses recorded during investigation particularly of Police Kumar who took both injured to Hospital in a conscious condition, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail at this stage. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is hereby rejected.

However, the petitioners would be at liberty to renew their prayer for bail after one year in jail custody. (S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T