Ravishankar Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68733 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2021 Thana- SANDESH District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.
Ravishankar Ram Son Of Deo Nath Ram R/O Vill - Jamuaon, P.S. - Sandesh, Dist. - Bhojpur 2.
Pachratani Devi W/o Deo Nath Ram R/o vill - Jamuaon, P.S. - Sandesh, Dist. - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Uday Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 01-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506/34 and 304B of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation against the petitioners along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant due to nonfulfillment of further dowry demand.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. They have committed no offence. He submitted that the petitioner no. 1 is the brother-in-law and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68733 of 2023(2) dt.01-11-2023 2/2 petitioner no. 2 is the mother-in-law of the deceased. He submitted that the petitioners have no concern with mess and business of the deceased as well as her husband and also they live separately from them. Further, it is submitted that the husband of the deceased is languishing in judicial custody. The other co-accused has already been granted bail by this Bench vide order dated 28.02.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 70524 of 2022. They are languishing in judicial custody for about three months.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Sandesh P.S. Case No. 41 of 2021.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T