Aman Kumar @ Aman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69355 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2024 Thana- BARHIYA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Aman Kumar @ Aman son of Ramsevak Singh Village -Jaitpur P.S -Barahiya District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ankit For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case no. 158 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 353, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code Sections 8, 20B, 11B, 25 of the N.D.P.S. Act and Section 25(1)(b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3, The case of the prosecution is that from the bathan of Vikki Singh, 5.30 kg of Ganja was recovered. It is further alleged that after the seizure police went to the house of Vikki Singh for raid, there Ramkumari Devi, Ramsewak Singh and Aman Kumar (Petitioner) in this case abused and created hindrance in search. Only allegation against this petitioner is that he abused and created hindrance in search. The occurrence is in two parts; in first part, there is recovery of Ganja and in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69355 of 2024(2) dt.18-10-2024 2/2 second part, this petitioner has created hindrance in seizure.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. It is also submitted that there is no allegation of seizure from these petitioners.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 158 of 2024, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Lakhisarai subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T