Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43775/2017bail granted

Rahul Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43775 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43775 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -321 Year- 2017 Thana -MAJORGANJ District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Rahul Kumar, Son of Sri Surendar Saah, R/o Village- Rampur Gangoli, P.S.- Riga, District- Sitamarhi.

2. Vishwamohan Kumar Son of Sri Ram Sujas Mahto, R/o Village- Bela Shahwajpur Dina, P.S.- Riga, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioners/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 321 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of altogether eighteen litres of Nepali liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been implicated in this case. Moreover, they have sufficiently been punished for the said offence as they have been in judicial custody since 22.08.2017 and have no criminal antecedents.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43775 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioners have no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 321 of 2017. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioners again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T