Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34127/2016bail granted

Bipin Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-31Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34127 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -859 Year- 2014 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA ====================================================== Bipin Kumar Singh Son of Late Nageshwar Singh Resident of Village- (Maldhyatola), Mokama, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 31-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case, initially, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 365/34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on, Section 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code was also added.

Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this court vide order dated 18.01.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42513 of 2015 and analogous case but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that having more or less similar allegation, co-accused, Anant Singh @ Anant Kumar Singh has already been granted privilege of bail by this court vide order dated 10.08.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 27851 of 2016.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34127 of 2016 (2) dt.31-08-2016 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 859 of 2014, subject to condition that any attempt to terrorize the prosecution witnesses or to tamper with the prosecution evidence by or on behalf of the petitioner, shall give liberty to the concerned court to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after due and proper enquiry.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T