Ranjit Singh @ Ranjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63892 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2021 Thana- SHYAMPUR BHATHA District- Sheohar ====================================================== 1.

RANJIT SINGH @ RANJIT KUMAR Son of Late Ramkripal Singh Resident of Shyampur, P.S.- Shyampur Bhatha, District - Sheohar. 2.

Ravindra Singh @ Ravindra Kumar Son of Ramashray Singh Resident of Shyampur, P.S.- Shyampur Bhatha, District - Sheohar. 3.

Krishnandan Dubey Son of Late Ramchandra Dubey Resident of Shyampur, P.S.- Shyampur Bhatha, District - Sheohar.

4.

Shivchandra Dubey Son of Keshwar Dubey Resident of Shyampur, P.S.- Shyampur Bhatha, District - Sheohar.

5.

Sajaullaha Son of Md. Umair Resident of Shyampur, P.S.- Shyampur Bhatha, District - Sheohar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 24-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 186, 353 and 283 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioners is that they alongwith other accused persons gathered and obstructed government work.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63892 of 2022(2) dt.24-02-2023 2/3 petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics and malicious intention. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He further submits that the petitioners are not named in the FIR, and no incriminating articles has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent, which is also mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as there is a general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Bhatha P.S. Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63892 of 2022(2) dt.24-02-2023 3/3 No.25 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T