Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47301/2017bail granted

Shankar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-17Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47301 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -223 Year- 2013 Thana -ROSERA District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Shankar Ram son of Late Kapil Ram, resident of Mohalla- Katharbanni, Ward No. 10, Under near Panchayat Rosera, Police Station- Rosera, District- Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 08.03.2017 in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 223 of 2013 for the offences alleged under Sections 468, 409, 311 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and there is no specific accusation against the petitioner. It is stated that the petitioner was in fact an employee of the Company who was doing work of cleaning the office and was not paid salary for three months and thus he himself is a victim. Coaccused Sanjay Mandal, the Managing Director of the Company was deposited Rs. 65,000/- and has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 19540 of 2014. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47301 of 2017 (3) dt.17-10-2017 satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st, Rosera, District- Samastipur, in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 223 of 2013, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/Chandran U T