← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2834/2016disposed

Rameshwar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-11Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2834 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17111 of 2014 ====================================================== Rameshwar Mahto, Son of Bangali Mahto, Resident of Village + P.O. Kamroy, P.S. Dalsinghsarai, District - Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely, D.S. Gangwar.

2. Mr. D.S. Gangwar, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. Sanjeevan Kumar Sinha, the Joint Secretary, Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. Mr. Ram Chandra Tuddu, the Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. Mr. Brajesh Kumar Ojha, the District Education Officer, Samastipur.

6. Mr. Ram Naresh Singh, the Block Education Extension Officer, Bithan, District - Samastipur.

7. Smt. Asha Kumari, the Head Master, Upgraded Middle School, Sihma Bithan, District - Samastipur.

8. Mr.

Ram Chandra Mandal, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), District - Samastipur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. GP-17 Kameshwar Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 11-09-2018 In view of the reasoned office order passed on 21.08.2018 by the District Education Officer, Samastipur, a copy of which is enclosed with the supplementary show case as Annexure-'A' filed on behalf of opposite party no. 8, the present contempt application cannot proceed.

The petitioner, if so advised may challenge the order

Patna High Court MJC No.2834 of 2016 (4) dt.11-09-2018 passed by District Education Officer in an appropriate proceeding and appropriate jurisdiction.

This application stands disposed off, accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Ved/- U