Patna High CourtCWJC/12807/2015dismissed

Kanti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-10-15Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12807 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Kanti Kumari, wife of Sri Anuj Kumar Sharma, resident of village- Diha, P.S.- Ariari, District- Sheikhpura, presently posted as Head Teacher, Primary School, Ambedkar Colony, Sandalpur, Mahendur, P.S.- Sultanganj, Block- Patna Sadar, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Education Officer, Patna.

4. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Patna.

5. The School Sub-Inspector, Mahendru, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra Mr. Arun Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikas Kumar, AC to AG =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 15-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the affidavit of the Senior Superintendent of Police as well as the District Education Officer.

The law was set in motion. It has taken its course. Accused was arrested. Charge-sheet was filed. The trial of the case ought to be expedited.

Petitioner has already availed an option of transfer which as per the rule is available to a person only twice in his service career and at least within a gap of 5 years.

Patna High Court CWJC No.12807 of 2015 dt.15-10-2015 2 / 2 After perusing the materials on record, the Court comes to a considered opinion that the problem faced by the petitioner is not unique. Every other citizen in the State of Bihar is on the receiving end, in one manner or the other. That by itself cannot be treated to be an administrative ground on which the Court will direct respondent authorities to transfer the petitioner.

Writ application has no merit. It is dismissed. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/- U