Mahesh Mahto And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38778 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -271 Year- 2013 Thana -MARHAURA District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Mahesh Mahto Son of Late Araj Mahto,

2. Meena Devi @ Sukeshra Devi, Wife of Mahesh Mahto, Both residents of Village Mubarakpur, P.S. Marhowrah, District- Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Marhoura P.S. Case No. 271 of 2013 registered under Sections 304(B)/201/34 of the I.P.C. pending in the Court of A.C.J.M.-II, Chapra, Saran.

The accusation is of killing of daughter of the informant by her husband and in-laws due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry within one year of the marriage. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners, who happen to be mother-inlaw and father-in-law of the deceased, have falsely been implicated in this case.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38778 of 2016 (2) dt.03-10-2016 2/2 Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegation, I am not inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this application is rejected.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Shail/- U T