Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45657/2017bail granted

Munna Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-19Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45657 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45657 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -193 Year- 2017 Thana -BAIKUNTHPUR District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Munna Singh son of Late Sakal Singh resident of village - Dhenuki, P.S. Panapur, District - Saran at Chapra.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jeetendra Narayan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Baikunthpur P.S. Case No. 193 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 111 litres of foreign liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 4.8.2017 and other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 15.09.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 43979 of 2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45657 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017 circumstances of the case and also the fact that other co-accused of this case has already been granted bail by this Court, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, in connection with Baikunthpur P.S. Case No. 193 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T