← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62880/2025bail granted

Mantu Kumar @ Bullu v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-17Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62880 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2025 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Mantu Kumar @ Bullu S/O Nakul Prasad R/O Village- Jhaur, P.SWarisaliganj, Dist- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sudish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 297 of 2025 dated 04.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 111(4) read with section 3(5) of the BNS and 66B, 66D I.T. of the Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, on secret information, police conducted a raid and apprehended the petitioner and the co-accused persons and some succeeded to flee away who were indulged in cyber crime. On search some mobile phones in the name of another persons, were recovered from their possession.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62880 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 It is further alleged that all the accused persons were indulged in cyber crime by enticing the people to give them loan in the name of Dhani Finance.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No one has made any complaint against the petitioner regarding any fraud. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 04.06.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nawada in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 297 of 2025, with the condition/s:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62880 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 3/3 cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T