Patna High CourtMJC/2532/2015dismissed

Gauri Shankar Vidyarthi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-12-07Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2532 of 2015 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 473 of 2015 ====================================================== Gauri Shankar Vidyarthi Son of Late Nand Kishor Prasad, Resident of Village - Itimha, P.O. - Karma, P.S. - Nasariganj, District - Rohtas (Sasaram) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Anjani Kumar Singh, the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Dicstirct Magistrate, Sri Rajeshwar Pd. Singh, Kaimur (Bhabhua)

3. Sri Khursid Anwar Siddqui, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Mohania, District -Kaimur (Bhabhua)

4. Sri Sunil Kumar, the Deputy Development Commissioner, District - Kaimur (Bhabhua)

5. Sri Ravindra Kumar, the Senior Deputy Collector (Establishment), District - Kaimur (Bhabhua)

6. Sri Satya Prakash Narayan, The Treasury Officer, District - Kaimur (Bhabhua)

7. Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, the Block Development Officer, Adhaora, District - Kaimur (Bhabhua)

8. Md. Aslam, the Block Development Officer, Ramgarh Block, District - Kaimur (Bhabhua)

9. Sri Binod Kumar Prasad, the Block Development Officer, Nuwa Block, District - Kaimur (Bhabhua)

10. Sri Rajan Kumar Chaudhary, the District Certificate Officer, District - Kaimur (Bhabhua) .... .... Opp. Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Opp. Party/s : Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadav, G.P. 23 Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AC to G.P. 23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-12-2016 When the matter has been taken up, a supplementary show cause on behalf of the opposite party nos. 2 and 8 is being filed by the learned G.P. 23, which is taken on the record. The learned G.P. 23 appearing on behalf of the opposite parties submits that now, the order of the writ Court has been complied with.

Patna High Court MJC No.2532 of 2015 (3) dt.07-12-2016 2/2 The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid submission. In above view of the matter, the present contempt petition is disposed of as infructuous.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U