Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63282 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2025 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son of Umesh Yadav R/o Village - Balipakar, P.S.- Paliganj, District - Patna (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Alka Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 10-10-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 310(2) of the BNS.
3. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 24.01.2025.
4. The allegation against the petitioner is to commit dacoity alongwith other co-accused person and while committing so looted tracker, trailor and pump etc. which was found in possession of this petitioner.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the name of petitioner transpired
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63282 of 2025(2) dt.10-10-2025 2/3 during the course of investigation on the basis of report of police spy whereafter his self confession was recorded. It is submitted that in furtherance of his self confession no incriminating material recovered during investigation as to connect petitioner prima-facie with present crime in question. Petitioner was not put on TIP as yet. It is submitted that the alleged tractor was recovered from the possession of coaccused namely, Nagendra Kumar @ Ravi Kumar who has already been granted bail by this Court through Cr. Misc. No. 35723 of 2025 dated 10.10.2025. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and moreover, investigation of this case is completed, for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.
6. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.
7. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of fact as save and except suspicion arising out of report of police spy and self confession prima-facie nothing incriminating material recovered as to connect petitioner with present crime in question, coupled with fact that investigation
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63282 of 2025(2) dt.10-10-2025 3/3 of this case already completed where petitioner being a man of clean antecedent remains in custody since 24.01.2025, accordingly petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM VI, Danapur /concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 480(3) of BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Sudha/- U T