Aditya Kumar @ Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65749 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2023 Thana- NOORSARAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== ADITYA KUMAR @ AJIT KUMAR SON OF INDUBHUSHAN PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SHODIHA, P.S. - NOORSARAI, DISTRICT - NALANDA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 17-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, the informant is posted as R.O. in Bandhan Bank Chandi and engaged in collection of Bandhan Bank group. When the informant was returning after collecting of total Rs. 1,23,115/- in the meantime some unknown persons pushed him from motorcycle and assaulted by fists and slaps and snatched his bag containing aforesaid cash, samsung company tab and other articles.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65749 of 2023(2) dt.17-10-2023 2/2 that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional statement of Boby Kumar, which has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No T.I. Parade has been done. He is languishing in judicial custody since 25.07.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 148 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T