← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45853/2017bail granted

Ajay Kumar Sahni @ Ajay Sahni And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-19Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45853 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45853 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -521 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAGARIA District- KHAGARIA ======================================================

1. AJAY KUMAR SAHNI @ AJAY SAHNI, son of Laddu Lal Sahni

2. Md. Majhar, son of Md. Rajjak

3. Guddu Kumar Sahni @ Guddu Kumar, son of Ganesh Sahni

4. Hadisa Khatoon, wife of Md. Rajjak All resident of VillageRanisakarpura, P.S. Ganhour, District- Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jai Kishor Poddar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioners seeks regular bail in connection with Khagaria (Gangour) P.S.Case No.521 of 2017 , G.R.No.2261 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against the petitioners is about recovery of 29 ltrs. of liquor.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they have remained in custody since 3.8.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45853 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J. 3rd, Khagaria in connection with Khagaria (Gangour) P.S.Case No.521 of 2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T