Subodh Kumar @ Karu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64060 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-623 Year-2022 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== SUBODH KUMAR @ KARU SINGH Son of Late Sarju Singh R/v- Amri, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 21-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 307, 337, 338, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per prosecution case, while the informant was returning from his friend's house, in the meantime, the accused persons including the petitioner came and started assaulting him by means of iron rod due to which he sustained injuries. It is further alleged that the co-accused namely, Bittu Singh fired bullet on his left leg.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64060 of 2022(2) dt.21-02-2023 2/2 falsely been implicated in this case. The specific allegation of shot fire is against co-accused namely, Bittu Singh not against this petitioner. As per injury report annexed with this petition, five X-ray have been conducted and out of which four X-Ray reports found normal except one which is fracture on left foot but the same was not a vital part. The injury report does not show any gun shot injury as alleged in FIR. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 26.8.2022.

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Muffasil (Gaya) P.S. Case No. 623 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Gaya. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T