Rajnish Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 66083 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2025 Thana- AGIAON BAZAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Rajnish Singh S/o Late Raj Kishore Singh R/o Village- Kothua, P.S.- Agiaon Bazar, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Diwakar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Kalyan Shankar, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Agiaon Bazar P.S Case No. 77 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1) and 325 of the BNS.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner called informant's son namely Naveen Kumar @ Bittu at his house and assaulted him and with intention to murder him, cut the throat of his son on account of suspicion that his son was at talking terms with petitioner's daughter.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He next
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 66083 of 2025(3) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 submits that petitioner was not arrested on the spot and the specific allegation levelled against him is of assaulting the son of the informant and slitting his throat because the son of the informant and the daughter of the petitioner was having continuous talks with each other and the petitioner was not happy of it. He further submits that informant is not the eye witness to the alleged occurrence. Moreover, injury sustained by the son of the informant is simple in nature and caused by shaving blade. He further submits that both the parties have compromised amicable and they don't want to proceed the case further. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 05.07.2025 having no criminal antecedent.
5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
6. On perusal of the FIR, impugned order dated 21.08.2025, it appears that informant has supported his case at Para-03 of his re-statement and the witnesses at para 07 and 08 have also supported the prosecution case. From Para 11 of the case diary shows that the I.O. seized a blade of Gillete Guard with blood stain and blood stained soil from the place of occurrence. During the course of proceeding for bail before the learned Court below, the informant and his son appeared before
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 66083 of 2025(3) dt.17-09-2025 3/3 the Trial Court in person and submitted that he was not assaulted by the petitioner rather in the scuffle he fell on a sharp edged weapon and sustained injury and after realizing their sins, both the parties entered into compromise agreement with the petitioner and don't want to proceed this case any further. So, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Agiaon Bazar P.S Case No. 77 of 2025.
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Sunnykr/- U