← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3435/2016disposed

Putun Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-07-09Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3435 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3697 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Putun Singh, son of Late Bipin Singh.

2. Ranjay Kumar, son of Sri Rama Raman Prasad Kunwar, Both residents of Village- Bankati North, P.O.- Mahua, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sri Rahul Kumar, The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

3. Sri Daya Nand Mishra, The Deputy Development Commissioner, Gopalganj.

4. Sri Mritunjay Kumar, The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gopalganj.

5. Sri Kanhaiya Prasad Sah, The District Engineer, Gopalganj.

6. Sri Indu Bhushan Sinha, The Circle Officer, Baikunthpur, Gopalganj.

7. Bipin Thakur

8. Sudesh Thakur

9. Rajendra Thakur

10. Dhurendra Thakur All sons of late Kashi Thakur, All Resident of Village- Bankati North, P.O.- Mahua, P.S.-Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandit, Advocate For the State :

Mr. U. P. Singh, AC to SC 4 For the No.5 :

Mr. Satya Prakash Tripathy, Advocate Mr. Satya Vrat, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 09-07-2018 In the writ petition, the only direction to the Circle Officer, respondent no.6, was to conclude the encroachment proceedings and from the show cause filed, we find that the encroachment proceedings have been concluded and, therefore, now, no further action is required to be taken in this application. In case, in the final order passed, encroachment is found to be

Patna High Court MJC No.3435 of 2016(8) dt.09-07-2018 2/2 established, then petitioners may resort to such steps as may be permissible in law for execution of the order passed by the executive officer and removal of the encroachment. With the aforesaid, the application stands disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Sunil/- U