Rohit Kumar Prasad @ Rohit Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65542 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2021 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran ====================================================== ROHIT KUMAR PRASAD @ ROHIT KUMAR SINGH S/O BRAJ KISHORE PRASAD R/v- Maricha, P.S.- Sahajitpur, District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajiv Nayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 406, 420, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, informant came to know from his son that his pick-up van bearing registration No. BR01GF6024 which was being driven by driver Jeet Yadav, was looted away by the accused persons including the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. On the basis of his self confession recorded in other case of Taraya P.S. Case No. 429 of 2021, and then he h as been remanded in this case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65542 of 2022(3) dt.20-03-2023 2/2 has not been put on TIP. Save and except self confession before the police, there is no other material against the petitioner to show his involvement in the present case. Co-accused Munshi Mahto has already been enlarged on bail by another Bench of this Court vide order dated 9.5.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 27218 of 2022. Petitioner is in custody since 13.01.2022. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge XI, Saran at Chapra in connection with Taraya P.S. Case No. 375 of 2021.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U