← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14278/2013disposed

Lakshmi Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-03-15Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14278 of 2013 ===========================================================

1. Lakshmi Sah Son Of Late Arjun Sah Resident Of Village : Rain Vishuni, P.S. : Runnisaidpur, District : Sitamarhi

2. Asharfi Sah Son Of Late Arjun Sah Resident Of Village : Rain Vishuni, P.S. : Runnisaidpur, District : Sitamarhi

3. Maheshwar Baitha Son Of Rami Baitha Resident Of Village : Ibrahimpur, P.S. : Runnisaidpur, District : Sitamarhi

4. Janki Baitha Son Of Bachcha Baitha Resident Of Village : Ibrahimpur, P.S. : Runnisaidpur, District : Sitamarhi

5. Chhathu Rai Son Of Late Dukhal Rai Resident Of Village : Athri, P.S. : Runnisaidpur, District : Sitamarhi

6. Jitendra Rai Son Of Chhathu Rai Resident Of Village : Athri, P.S. : Runnisaidpur, District : Sitamarhi

7. Ram Daresh Dara Son Of Chhedi Dara Resident Of Village : Bhedadih, P.S. : Runnisaidpur, District : Sitamarhi

8. Dorik Pandit Son Of Ghuran Pandit Resident Of Village : Ibrahimpur, P.S. : Runnisaidpur, P.O. : Rain Shankar, District : Sitamarhi

9. Md. Subedar Son Of Md. Mahruddi Resident Of Village : Kharka, P.S. : Runnisaidpur, District : Sitamarhi

10. Md. Janif Son Of Md. Khalil Resident Of Village : Kharka, P.S. : Runnisaidpur, District : Sitamarhi

11. Dasrath Sah Son Of Saukhi Sah Resident Of Village And P.O. : L Ram Nagar, P.S. : Runnisaidpur, District : Sitamarhi

12. Shivjee Sah Son Of Fudi Sah Resident Of Village : Kharka, P.O. : Rain Shankar, P.S. : Runnisaidpur, District : Sitamarhi

13. Lal Babu Sah Son Of Fudi Sah Resident Of Village : Kharka, P.O. : Rain Shankar, P.S. : Runnisaidpur, District : Sitamarhi

14. Vishwanath Sah Son Of Arjun Sah Resident Of Village : Rain Vishuni, P.O. Rain Shankar, District : Sitamarhi

15. Fulji Kumar Sah Son Of Lakshmi Sah Resident Of Village : Rain Vishuni, P.O. Rain Shankar, District : Sitamarhi

16. Smt. Sukhia Devi Wife Of Chhedi Das Resident Of Village : Bhadadih, P.S. : Runnisaidpur, District : Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna

2. The Secretary/Deputy Secretary, The Department Of Disaster Management, Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate And Collector, Sitamarhi

4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sitamarhi

5. The Deputy Collector, Department Of Flood Relief, Sitamarhi

6. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, District - Sitamarhi

7. The Circle Officer, Runnisaidpur, District : Sitamarhi .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. JIWAN PRAKASH SINHA, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. AMIT KUMAR ANAND AC TO GP-15 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 15-03-2016

Patna High Court CWJC No.14278 of 2013 dt.15-03-2016 2/2 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the State. Several Boat Owners have jointly filed this application to command the respondents for making payment of the rent of the Boats to the Boat Owners and wages of the Boat Man (Navik), as the State requisitioned the boats and sources to deal with the flood in the district of Sitamarhi. Naturally, meager amount shall be payable to each of them by the respondents. Even then, it appears that the respondents defaulted in making payment of those admissible dues. From the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Circle Officer, Runnisaidpur, it appears that steps have now been taken to get the objections in such payment rectified/removed and to pay the admissible dues of the petitioners. It is stated that the respondents shall be able to make payment of the legitimate dues of the petitioners at the earliest.

The writ application stands disposed of by directing the respondents particularly the District Magistrate-cum-Collector Sitamarhi to ensure that the admissible dues are paid to the petitioners as quickly as possible preferably within three months from the date of receipt/production of the order before him. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) rohit/- U