Vinay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66697 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2023 Thana- SIWAIPATTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== VINAY KUMAR SINGH SON OF LATE MAHENDRA SINGH RESIDENT OF BHAGWAN CHAPRA, P.S. - SIWAIPATTI, DISTRICT - MUZAFFARPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Prakash Shrarma, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 31-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Siwaipatti P.S. Case No.59 of 2023, registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 307, 354, 504 of the IPC. 3.

Allegedly, the petitioner along with other F.I.R. named accused persons came with iron rod and assaulted the informant repeatedly.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No such occurrence in the manner as alleged has ever

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66697 of 2023(2) dt.31-10-2023 2/2 taken place. Parties are agnates and there is a land dispute between them. Petitioner has also filed a complaint case against the informant and her husband. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that there is specific allegation against the petitioner and the injury of the injured was found grievous in nature. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. 7.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

8.

However, petitioner is at liberty to surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass order, preferably, on the same day, in accordance with law. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T