Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Rajak v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46914 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -148 Year- 2017 Thana -DHAMDAHA District- PURNIA ====================================================== Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Rajak, son of Raj Kumar Rajak, Resident of village Kukron No. 2, P.S. Dhamdaha, District- Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 11-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 148 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 504, 307 and 379/34of the Indian Penal Code. As per written report, there is specific allegation against co-accused Raj Kumar Rajak of assaulting the informant on her head with iron rod. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 148 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46914 of 2017 (2) dt.11-10-2017 2/2 bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T