Bhaskar Kharwar @ Bhaskar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65268 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2019 Thana- CHOUTARWA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

BHASKAR KHARWAR @ BHASKAR PRASAD Son of Rajdev Kharwar Resident of Village - Palat Rai, P.S.- Gopalpur, Distt - Gopalganj. 2.

Rajdev Kharwar @ Rajdeo Kharwar @ Ram Pravesh Prasad @ Ram Prawest Kharwar @ Rajdeo Prasad Son of Late Gorakh Kharwar Resident of Village - Palat Rai, P.S.- Gopalpur, Distt - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sunil Kharwar, son of Late Sadhu Kharwar, resident of village Hamira Parsauni Firm, P. S. Chutarwa, Dist. West Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Subhash Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-01-2020 Petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Chautarawa P.S. Case No. 129 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

As per prosecution case, marriage of petitioner No.1 was fixed with the daughter of the informant and in spite of spending of Rs.2 lac, petitioners refused to solemnize marriage of daughter of the informant with petitioner No.1. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that as a matter of fact opposite party No.2 has come only for a talk of marriage and as petitioner No.1 is still studying

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65268 of 2019(3) dt.09-01-2020 2/2 engineering course, as such he is not ready to solemnize marriage at this juncture and whole allegation is false and concocted.

Heard learned APP and learned counsel for informant, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail stating that marriage card has already been printed and he has spent lot of money for marriage.

In view of above facts and circumstances, let petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Bagaha, West Champaran, in connection with Chautarawa P.S. Case No. 129 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T