Guddu Sah @ Guddu Kumar Gupta @ Guddu Gupta v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70014 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2024 Thana- NARAINPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.
Guddu Sah @ Guddu Kumar Gupta @ Guddu Gupta Son of Late Bangi sah Resident of Village- Narayanpur, P.S.- Narayanpur, District- Bhojpur at Ara 2.
Dhanjee Sah @ Dhanjee Gupta Son of Dadan Sah Resident of villageNarayanpur, P.S.- Narayanpur, District- Bhojpur at Ara 3.
Amit Sah @ Amit Kumar Son of Anil Sah Resident of Village- Narayanpur, P.S.- Narayanpur, District- Bhojpur at Ara ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shubham Sourav, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-10-2024 Heard Mr. Shubham Sourav, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant's side by means of lathi and knife.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70014 of 2024(2) dt.21-10-2024 2/2 case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. He submits that the persons, who were injured, have sustained simple injury (Annexure-12 of this application). Petitioners no. 1 and 3 have no criminal antecedent and petitioner no. 2 has one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the injury, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No.45 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T